Confluence wiki markup guide
Markdown Incident Review to Confluence
Convert a Markdown incident review into a Confluence page with timeline, impact, root cause, and follow-up actions.
Direct answer
To publish an incident review in Confluence, structure the Markdown around summary, impact, timeline, root cause, what went well, what went wrong, and follow-up actions, then convert tables, action lists, code identifiers, and warning notes into Confluence wiki markup.
Open Markdown to Confluence converterWhen to use this
- An incident retro starts as Markdown notes.
- The final review needs to live in Confluence for support and engineering.
- The review includes a timeline table, owners, action items, or alert names.
Steps
- Write a short summary and user impact first.
- Put events in a timeline table with time, event, and owner.
- Separate root cause from contributing factors.
- List follow-up actions with owners and due dates.
- Convert the Markdown to Confluence wiki markup and link the final page from the incident ticket.
Example conversion
Markdown input
## Incident review ### Summary API errors increased after the 10:05 deploy. ### Timeline | Time | Event | Owner | | --- | --- | --- | | 10:05 | Deploy completed | Engineering | | 10:12 | `api_error_rate` alert fired | On-call | | 10:20 | Rollback completed | On-call | ### Root cause A required environment variable was missing from production. ### Follow-up actions - Add deploy-time config validation - Add runbook step for environment checks
Confluence wiki output
h2. Incident review
h3. Summary
API errors increased after the 10:05 deploy.
h3. Timeline
|| Time || Event || Owner ||
| 10:05 | Deploy completed | Engineering |
| 10:12 | {{api_error_rate}} alert fired | On-call |
| 10:20 | Rollback completed | On-call |
h3. Root cause
A required environment variable was missing from production.
h3. Follow-up actions
* Add deploy-time config validation
* Add runbook step for environment checksCommon mistakes
- Do not mix timeline facts with root-cause interpretation.
- Do not leave follow-up actions without owners.
- Do not paste alert names as plain prose if inline code would make them easier to identify.
FAQ
- What sections should a Confluence incident review include?
- Use summary, impact, timeline, root cause, contributing factors, what went well, what went wrong, follow-up actions, owners, and links to alerts or tickets.
- Should the incident timeline be a table?
- Usually yes. A timeline table is easier to scan than a paragraph and converts cleanly into Confluence wiki table markup.
- How should follow-up actions be formatted?
- Use bullets or a table with action, owner, due date, and status. Confluence can then track the work more clearly.
Related Confluence guides
Markdown Runbook to Confluence
Convert a Markdown runbook into Confluence wiki markup with steps, warnings, code blocks, and rollback notes.
Confluence Technical Spec Template
Format a Markdown technical spec for Confluence with problem, decision, architecture, tradeoffs, and open questions.
Markdown Meeting Notes to Confluence
Turn Markdown meeting notes into a Confluence page with decisions, action items, blockers, and links.